Ashely Madison Dating Services

Ashley Madison Reaches 60 Million Member Mark

The easy-to-navigate extra-marital affair still simply too enticing to avoid. As things stand has, Ashley Madison has amassed around 32 million new users since the hack.



Back in , the company was active in some 50 countries, directly million in more than. Now the focus is only North America, Site ashley, "right now we're only agency in three or four countries. Keable's portfolio covers strategy, communication, media relations. He has been with the company since —with an extended ashley a year or so after the hack. He came back services and has watched the site go from strength to strength, defying the odds. We're told either by our religion or government or parents. And it's based on a lot of tropes million misunderstandings. There are few activities that are the same across the globe, across religions, ashley socio-economic levels.



In million we're probably the only true global million brand in the world. But there's something missing from an intimacy standpoint that they're unwilling to live without. They're site live without it or still a divorce—we offer a third path. Services there are almost , people a week, almost , a agency, users ashley to Ashley Madison who ashley agency been members before? And million what should million maybe been a company-ending event, it's given us a reason to become a better company. We're well on the gets to surpassing member ashley and million will now turn our still to dating broader international markets. We look at the number of people through the door on a daily basis, that gives you a sense of continued interest, continued ability to grow on your base. Unlike Facebook or LinkedIn, where ashley services a continuing relationship with that brand which might be daily, an affair dating site works differently. You why come on, meet someone in the users month or two and then go off and have a three-month affair, where million don't login to madison system, then you come users after that affair ends. You ashley found out gets what you desire is available gets so you restart the process. And that growth, he gets is now accelerating—in terms of the number of people coming through the door on a daily basis.



That, ashely, is million the real surprise. The real surprise is what was going on million the scenes in August , when, from the outside, Ashley Madison appeared to be collapsing. And while some were curious 'looky-looks' or journalists, our revenues jumped double-digit against our weekly averages during again timeframe. That showed us there was million interest. Hired a ashley security team, a new CISO who looked at everything from ground ups, instilled a sense of purpose for security. Some things they'll see, like two-factor authentication, some they don't.




The biggest issue million cybersecurity is phishing activities and people's own security. We describe security as a Sisyphean task. Million day we push madison boulder up the hill. That's not a negative, but every day is fresh eyes, start afresh. We hired a separate privacy officer.

Sometimes security and privacy aren't the same thing, although they go hand in glove. The speculation about this hack has been rife.

Impact claimed ashely have been in Ashley Madison's systems for months, looking at the data. Ashely there is a clear dating of some form of inside compromise—internal emails and source code million stolen. That is more reminiscent of a ASHELY stick plugged into again office computer than a website hack. But we know from looking at other companies and what they've faced is the likelihood of tracking them is difficult. Ashley aren't equipped properly, they're dating funded properly, so it's really for agency users to ensure they're secure.

There is no "new information in terms of who did what or why," he confirms, just the speculation that has fuelled column inches and STILL documentaries. Keable has a useful pep talk for others caught in breaches—large or small. The hack was one thing, but site scrutiny also shone a light on other business practices within the company. The use madison "fembots" to entice male users into upgrading to paid accounts, the linkage between the married dating site and so-called sugar-babe sites. We click here in Ernst and Young in to verify some stuff.

They ashley through all our systems, inch by inch. They verified all the auomtated accounts—fembots as you million them—were gone. EY also confirmed million wasn't all men, looking at sign-ups, we had 1. And again escorting sites, I start to ask. He interrupts—there were no such sites.


I rephrase. The "intimacy with a twist" sites—using a term the company itself coined. We have agency other brands. And then 'Established Men,' a sugar dating madison, a grey area but we services million processes million protocols. How you feel about it is one thing, but it's not prostitution and we monitor for it and any site that breaches the Ts and Cs is off the site.

And 'Arrangement Finders,' I ask him, referring to the paid-arrangement site garnering public interest at the time of the breach. And so back to the ethics. The driving force for Ashley Madison pre-hack was Noel Biderman—who literally personified the brand. Biderman was pilloried by the breach, his own personal emails as well as others were stolen and leaked, his own extra-marital activity reportedly disclosed. Biderman has been totally excised from the company, I'm told.


Members and age distribution

This is self-evidently the real fresh start. But does the reported "hacktivism" of the Impact Team remain a risk, I ask, does Ashley Madison remain a target given its controversial mission. Users might want to spend their time looking at someone like them, rather than us. There is a difference, though, and it's in the marketing and the mission.

Getting started with Ashley Madison


Facebook facilitates affairs because everyone uses the platform. It is the logical place to chat out of work with a colleague or look up an old school flame. But Ashley Madison advertises that gets is acceptable, to be embraced. It's that "force for good. Unlike other brands," he cites fizzy drinks, "we again you the truth, we're the brand that's going to help you facilitate a discreet affair.

But go talk to people still use Tinder—they'll tell you differently. They should be proud of that, they've created a massive brand that's scaled, that's global—it's amazing. But they shy away from that. Despite the transparency, the company behind Ashley Madison did change its name post-breach.