UAP File Drop: Are We Looking At Truth Or A Controlled Drip-Feed?

The UAP file drop ahead of the May 22 release got slammed by Ross Coulthart. He went from accusing the Pentagon of trying to “bore us to death,” to subsequently warning that humans may no longer be “the apex predator.” Read on for our take on that.

Excited Observers

At the moment, millions of people rush to social media or drop articles and blogs about UAPs. Many of them claim that the government finally drops some truth. But, should we be asking more about the drip-feed? Just how transparent is the government being?

Ross Coulthart is excited, but he’s less excited about some parts of it. Extensive redactions complicate serious discussion around UAPs. In other words, evidence, interpretation, and human mythology can muddy the waters.

Chris Cuomo appeared frustrated by the suggestion that the Trump Administration feels figuring fact from fiction is up to us.

Facts Vs Interpretation

In a discussion with Chris Cuomo, former Pentagon insider Luis Elizondo, Ross, and Harvard theoretical physicist Avi Loeb on NewsNation focused heavily on the facts surrounding the latest release.

They talked about unusual radar tracks and pilot testimony. These are facts. But, the “apex predator” seems based more on interpretation. In fact, there wasn’t anything released that verified in any way, that UAPs might be predatory or hostile.

What NASA’s Jared Said

It seems from what NASA administrator Jared Isaacman said to FOX News, is that the focus isn’t on actual extraterrestrials: “What’s being surfaced isn’t crashed ships or alien bodies, but real unexplained phenomena.”

One might argue that the military seems rather aggressive with UFOs. After all, there were instances of unknown phenomena being fired at. But does that necessarily mean that it’s a tit-for-tat reaction to aggression by unknown beings?

Explaining ‘Aggression’

So far, nothing points in the direction of aggression by UFOs. Often, on social media, observers will ask about human aggression. Is it needed?

Well, probably from the perspective of the military worldwide, anything that gets too close to sensitive projects or even military equipment must be assumed hostile. Especially if they ignore efforts to chase them off.

For the beings, if they exist, perhaps there’s a natural curiosity rather than aggressive intentions.

How Transparent Is The Drop?

Moving on from Ross, there’s also a healthy amount of skepticism from everyday folks with an interest in the unexplained.

Isaacman framed the drop as simply various reports being dumped and forgotten, but Trump pushing everyone to produce the real thing.

Notably, not everyone’s buying it, including Ross Coulthart. While boring us to death swings to more exciting stuff in the second drop, is it smoke and mirrors?

Is the Pentagon simply dropping more needles on top of the other needles buried in a haystack?

There’s certainly no denying that in the past, anything remotely alien was ridiculed, and then buried.

Of course, the celebrated dump of complicated documents and 50 raw videos is something to get excited about. But notably, it seems to fit rather neatly with the Pentagon managing to look compliant with new transparency mandates.

Dishing Half The UAP Puzzle

There’s always a “but” when it comes to opinion-based observers. It seems almost as if the drops can be equated to a puzzle with half the pieces missing. That keeps Congress happy, but are the real secrets still safely tucked away? Perhaps we will never know.

What are your thoughts? Drop them in the comments below, and remember to come back here often for more stories about mystery, the unexplained, and more.